there was me, that is alex, and my three droogs, that is pete, georgie and dim. we were all sitting in the korova trying to make up our razoodocks waht to do with the evening........

ugh....someone help me.......

don't worry, i'm *not* insane as you all might think....there *is* a purpose to this....

but i can't think of one right now....

okay....
ultra-violence...right


anyway......whatever you guys want to make this is fine with me :o)

By Essex-dog on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 - 12:49 pm:

im not sure sammie maybe your homo-eroctica fantasy coming to the fore

By Sammie on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 - 01:51 pm:

no...i just think that maybe i am insane

besides, if you don't undertand the clockwork orange reference then, don't bother asking stupid questions....or insinuating things.....homo-erotica fantasy indeed....

By Eddy on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 - 02:40 pm:

Now I'm rather tolerant, but with a lot of recent topics being shit, bollocks and pointless, I am making a stand.

If your gonna talk shit, e-mail me.

By nat on Tuesday, February 13, 2001 - 09:12 pm:

haha, and we've got his addy... that's class. (please stop me from laughing)
have a lovely time!

By Chocolate on Sunday, February 18, 2001 - 06:19 am:

Ha Ha

By chris on Sunday, February 18, 2001 - 06:25 am:

yes, 'We wore our hair not too long and we had flip horrorshow boots for kicking'

If you're insane Sam, I don't know what I'll be.

By Sammie on Sunday, February 18, 2001 - 12:15 pm:

"now comes the weepy part of my story, oh my brothers and only friends...."

we shall both be insane together i should imagine.

By Sammie on Sunday, February 18, 2001 - 01:04 pm:

"Viddy well, little brother. Viddy well."

By Your Humble Narrator on Sunday, February 18, 2001 - 02:47 pm:

Do you two devotchkas have horrorshow groodies for viddying, real lovely?

I'll get me rookers on em before any other veck! As easy as kiss my sharries!

Fancy a tolchock to the gulliver, O my brothers? kashl kashl kashl. I'd best be off like.

By chris on Monday, February 19, 2001 - 10:01 am:

How lovely.. real horrowshow groodies..why do malchicks like you love to out the topic?
What's everyone doing this nochy then?
Tolchock in the gulliver? hhmmm...
I prefer to peet the old moloko

By Alex De Larch on Monday, February 19, 2001 - 12:23 pm:

hi hi hi, my little brothers and sisters

i have always wondered about the gloopy malchickiwicks who present themselves in poison here and abouts. so, horrorshow groodies is it? well then, my little brother, thou canst have thy rookers to thy self, thou grazhny bratchny thou. and if thou come anywhere near me with thy glazzies all like bulging i shall like razrez them from thy litso.
do you pony that, my little brother?

By chris on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 - 08:43 am:

I'm sure the grazhny bratchny ponies that and if not, I shall look forward to you razrezzing them..
Thou shall not let that malchich disturb you from thy slooshying of Ludwig Van.. and peeting of the old moloko.

By C. on Tuesday, February 20, 2001 - 12:51 pm:

Ok, enough is enough. A Clockwork Orange was moderately good, but hardly an acclaimed piece of fiction. You're all talking complete bollocks, as good as announcing "I like spam". Imitation is for the weak-minded. Do us all a favour and cease your incessant proclaimed dribble and desist in the tainting of Stanley Kubrik's memory, you obnoxious simpletons.

By nat on Wednesday, February 21, 2001 - 01:43 am:

hm... favourite part? rapes the two ten year old girls. lovely, lovely piece. a reason why the film disappointed: it butchered the scene.

By The Occifer on Wednesday, February 21, 2001 - 01:31 pm:

Totally butchered! Although I appreciated the line Kubrick added about the girls sucking their icey-poles. "A bit cold and pointless isn't it?"

By Alex De Larch on Monday, February 26, 2001 - 12:20 pm:

excuse me, droogie "C" but, it was not Stanley Kubrik's work of art....that title belongs to anthony burgess and i have often heard that imitation is the best form of flattery.....if you would care to take a look at the unwritten parts of history, you will see that after the book and film were released, everyone started wearing bowler hats and talked in nadsat. check your facts before getting on your soap box.

By C. on Monday, February 26, 2001 - 07:31 pm:

The original fiction may be accredited to Burgess, but the vast majority of the Title's success is down to Kubrik's interpretation. Had the motion picture not been made, the book would only have achieved a mere fraction of the status.

The "Imitation is the best form of flattery" philosophy is only adopted by people in defence to their own tediously repetative "It was mildly entertaining for the first five minutes" performance. Who gives a fuck about bowler hat sales? It shows there's one hell of a lot of 'nadsat' talking sheep out there, also adopting the afore-mentioned saying. Break out of the flock and become a shepherd.

The overall point was that you were all talking bollocks no matter what the actual words were. It was barely a conversation, only a subtle show-offs guild which no-one can enjoy.

By The Lad on Tuesday, February 27, 2001 - 10:31 am:

What a load of bollox.

Me and me mates could talk nadsat before any geezer put out any book.


And hello to all the birds yeah.

By nat on Tuesday, February 27, 2001 - 10:28 pm:

hm, who thinks the lad is up for a bit of beastiality? ornithology, is it? my dic tionnary is too far away to grasp...